
Dylan Galvin is a Berklee College of Music graduate, mentored by music legends John Mayer, Paul Simon and Livingston Taylor. Performing across the United States since 2009, now based in the DMV (Washington DC, Maryland, and Virginia), more than 1,500 events, including work for Coca-Cola, Wells Fargo, Lincoln, and CBRE.
GigMasters does not exist anymore. And on the platform that replaced it, roughly half of all bookings go to a performer the client never picked.
Both of those are the company's own numbers, published on its own vendor blog. Neither one is obvious from the side of the screen where you are typing in your event details, which is the problem worth understanding before you send anything.
GigMasters was sold to XO Group, the parent company of The Knot, in 2015. The name was phased out through 2019 and 2020 in favor of The Bash, which is the company's own account of the change. Vendor profiles and reviews carried over. The corporate entity is still named GigMasters Inc, which is why the copyright line at the bottom of their vendor blog still reads that way today.
So the real 2026 comparison is The Bash against GigSalad. Both are marketplaces where you post an event, performers respond with quotes, and the platform handles contracts and payment for a cut. They work more alike than either would care to advertise. Where they differ is in what they charge you, and in how many people see your request.
When you request a quote on The Bash, there is a checkbox that lets the platform forward your request to additional similar vendors. The Bash calls this Auto-Add, and in its own guidance to performers it publishes the numbers: the request goes out to five or ten additional vendors, clients check that box 83% of the time, and almost half of all bookings on the platform come from these auto-added leads. GigSalad works the same way, forwarding requests to up to five or ten additional providers.
Read that 83% and 50% together and you get the thing nobody tells you. If you pick a performer, click through to their profile, and send them a message, there is close to a coin-flip chance that the person you eventually book is someone the platform added to the pile, not someone you chose.
It gets sharper. The Bash also tells its vendors that one in three gigs goes to whoever responds first, and gives them a 48 hour clock before the lead rolls to somebody else. The incentive being handed to every performer on the platform is speed, not fit.
The ordering is where it stops being neutral. A performer can reply to a request within ten or fifteen seconds and still find several quotes already sitting ahead of theirs. Neither platform offers autoresponders, so a human being had to read and answer that request first. Which means the notifications did not go out to everyone at once. Somebody was further up the queue, and the queue order is not published anywhere. The performer you actually picked may be well down it.
None of this is hidden exactly. It is just written for vendors rather than for you.
The brief a performer receives is thinner than most hosts imagine. Start time. End time. Whether a sound system is needed. Indoor or outdoor. Guest count. Sometimes a budget.
That is a logistics form, not a description of an event. What it leaves out is everything that determines whether the night actually works: what you are picturing, the mood you want in the room at seven versus at ten, the wedding you went to last year where the music was too loud and you have quietly been dreading a repeat, whether this is a crowd that dances or a crowd that talks.
None of that fits in the form, which is why the phone call matters more than anything else in this process. A performer working from the form alone is guessing. A performer who has spent fifteen minutes on the phone with you is planning.
Put the pieces together and the pattern is not an accident, it is just what the structure selects for. Requests go out to a pool. Speed wins a third of the time. Quotes land side by side where the only field that compares cleanly is price.
The Bash's own advice to new vendors closes the loop. It coaches them to tell clients they would be, in the platform's words, "happy to work with their budget," and to be flexible in order to land that first booking and first review.
That is reasonable advice for a performer trying to get started. It also tells you exactly what kind of market you are shopping in. These platforms attract buyers looking for a deal, which attracts performers willing to work below market rate to keep the calendar full, which brings in more buyers looking for a deal. There is nothing wrong with any of that if a deal is what you want. It is worth knowing that it is the water you are swimming in.
The risk is not that you overpay. It is that the marketplace gives you almost no way to tell a full-time professional from someone who bought a PA last spring, because both have a profile, both can respond, and in a list of quotes both look about the same.
Which brings up the signal most hosts lean on hardest, and the one that deserves the least trust.
Nothing stops a performer from quoting well under the going rate to everyone, all the time. It is not against any rule, and there is no industry body regulating what anyone charges. A performer doing that stays extremely busy, because they are the cheapest quote in almost every pile they land in. Busy means volume. Volume means reviews.
So the profile you are looking at, the one with a hundred and eighty five-star reviews and a Top Performer badge, may be telling you something quite different from what you think. A review count measures how many events someone has worked. It does not measure how good those events were, and on a platform where the fastest cheapest quote wins a third of the time, the performers with the most reviews are frequently the ones who got there by being the cheapest, not by being the best.
Read the reviews rather than counting them. A review that describes what actually happened in the room is worth fifty that say "great job, on time, would book again." And weigh what you see and hear on the profile more heavily than any badge, because the video is evidence and the badge is arithmetic.
The most useful thing these platforms offer a host is not the booking system. It is the search.
Browse GigSalad or The Bash, find two or three performers whose material you actually like, and then stop. Do not send the request through the platform. Type their name into Google and go to their own website instead.
That single step does two things. It removes the platform fee, and it removes the pile-on, so you are having one conversation with one person instead of fielding quotes from seven strangers racing each other downward on price.
It also doubles as a filter. Any working entertainer should rank for their own name immediately, because ranking for your own name is close to the easiest thing there is in search. If you type a performer's name into Google and nothing obvious comes back, no site, no video, no listing, that tells you something about how seriously they run the business, before you have spent a minute of your time.
One more rule, and it is not optional. Never submit a request form without a budget. A request with no number attached invites every performer in the pool to guess, which guarantees the lowball scrum and tells you nothing about who is actually right for the event. If you do not have a budget yet, you are not ready to book entertainment. Work out the number first. A breakdown of what the different tiers of the market actually get you is a reasonable place to start if you are not sure what your number should be.
If you do go through the platform, do the filtering yourself before you spend time talking to anyone.
Start with the profile and be blunt about it, and start somewhere other than the star rating. How are they presented in their photos. Is the video recent, or is the most current thing on there clearly a decade old. Is the audio on that video something you would want in your room. Then go to their website and judge it the way you would judge any other contractor. You would not hire a roofing company with a website that looks abandoned to work on your house. The same instinct applies here, and it is a better signal than most people give it credit for, because in live entertainment the share of people working regularly without running a professional operation is higher than in almost any other trade.
Then there is the one that settles it. Any performer unwilling to get on a phone or video call is a red flag, and it is not a close call. A professional should want that conversation. They should be asking about your vision, engaging with what you are picturing, and visibly interested in making the night work. Someone who will not give you fifteen minutes before the event is not going to give you more attention during it. Do not book them.
Be realistic about what your budget buys, though. Below roughly seven hundred dollars you are at the bottom of the market, and at that level a lot of performers will not take a planning call, because the economics do not support that kind of preparation. That is not them being difficult. It is what the price gets. Expect it and decide accordingly.
The rest of the vetting process, including the specific questions worth asking once you are on the phone, is covered in the full guide to hiring a musician. It is also worth understanding what actually happens when a performer does not show and what to do if a vendor cancels on you weeks out, because both are far more common at the budget end of the market than most hosts expect.
If you do book through a platform, the fee difference is worth knowing. Performers on The Bash pay an annual membership plus a 5% booking fee. As the host, what you pay is a 2.95% service fee when you submit a deposit or balance through their payment system.
GigSalad charges performers 5% as free members and 2.5% as paid members, and charges you an event planner service fee of 10 to 12% of the total booking price.
On a four thousand dollar booking that is roughly a hundred and eighteen dollars on The Bash against four hundred to four hundred and eighty on GigSalad. Similar protections either way. Three to four times the cost.
GigMasters was rebranded as The Bash between 2019 and 2020 and the company still operates under that name today. It was acquired by XO Group, the parent company of The Knot, in 2015, and the rename followed a few years later. Vendor profiles and reviews carried over, so performers you may have booked through GigMasters are generally still listed.
Yes, if you leave the Auto-Add option checked, The Bash forwards your request to five or ten additional similar vendors. The company reports that clients opt into this 83% of the time and that almost half of all bookings on the platform come from those auto-added leads. GigSalad offers the same forwarding option.
GigSalad is worth it if you value speed and payment protection more than the 10 to 12% service fee it adds to your booking. You get responses quickly, a contract, and a company to escalate to if something goes wrong. What you do not get is any filter separating full-time professionals from hobbyists, so the vetting still falls to you.
GigSalad charges the person hiring a service fee of 10 to 12% of the total booking price, on top of the performer's rate. Performers separately pay 2.5 to 5% depending on their membership level. On a four thousand dollar booking, the buyer-side fee works out to roughly four hundred to four hundred and eighty dollars.
The largest practical difference is the fee you pay: about 2.95% on The Bash versus 10 to 12% on GigSalad. Both operate on the same model, forwarding your request to a pool of performers who then compete on response speed and price. Neither screens for professional experience.
Treat a high review count as evidence of volume, not evidence of quality. Nothing prevents a performer from quoting well below market to everyone, and doing that keeps them booked constantly, which produces a large pile of five-star reviews over time. Read what the reviews actually describe. The count tells you far less than the content does, and the performer's own video and website tell you more than any star rating or platform badge.
Usually yes, because you avoid the platform's service fee entirely and you avoid the quote pile-on that pushes performers to compete on price instead of fit. The tradeoff is that you take on the vetting, the contract, and the risk a marketplace would otherwise absorb. For a high-stakes event, that tradeoff generally favors going direct.
If you are searching for GigMasters, you are looking for The Bash, and of the two marketplaces it is the cheaper one for the person paying. But the fee is the smaller story. Both platforms are built to put your request in front of a pool of performers who are rewarded for answering fast and quoting low, and roughly half the time the person you end up hiring is not the person you picked. The star ratings will not save you from that, because the same pressure that produces the lowest quote also produces the longest list of reviews.
For a backyard party three weeks out, that machinery is genuinely useful and the tradeoff is fine. For a wedding, a milestone, or a gala where a planner's reputation is sitting in the room, it is the wrong tool, and the fix costs you one evening. Find the two or three performers you like on the platform, look them up properly, and talk to them directly. See what live wedding music looks like when you book it that way.